desktop_user [they/them]

can we only test in on men too?

exactly, where else has the thrill of risk with the safety of probably not getting caught?

would the tax be based on the number of livable units in the home?

it is simply preventing laws from banning a modern bulletin board billboard hybrid tech that teenagers use because it would restrict access to bulletin boards for adults and minors.

yes, but what if you don’t want mercy?

it would work pretty well after a few years, just ignore the deaths during the roll out.

sawdust is edible though, now digestable is a different question entirely and will require a few centuries of research to get data on due to my pro-sawdust-in-food lobbyists.

yes, however as far as I am aware there are no laws in the us against any private vehicle usage on private land. Unlike the FDA which criminalizes owning or consuming certain chemicals.

I don’t think everyone agrees on what it’s supposed to even mean. if you want no mercy to be given to you should that mean that you shouldn’t give others mercy?

time to make a recipe website that hides the recipe in JavaScript, but leaves the story in HTML.

finally, a map with Alaska and its diverse and strong opinions

similarly looking for sip companies, specifically with less discrimination against the 49th state.

fair, but I am going to try and get a pinephone soon anyway ¯\(ツ)/¯

it may be cheaper, but I fucking hate data caps.

join the pepper jack side

mostly because they don’t extract the lithium ion cells

I wouldn’t be so sure that my formaldhyde perfume isn’t carcinogenic, and that hasn’t been banned anywhere.

wo needs loved ones when you have money?

conveniently my phone’s last update was 11 (god I wish there were more security updates past 11 2023)

procrastination of drawing one