No Pushing Daisies?

Animation isn’t respected in the snobby “film” crowd. These are the same sorts of people that refuse to take Citizen Kane out of the number 1 movie slot. If movies peaked in 1941, what’s the point?

A lot these comments are more like

I’m upset because (my favorite 20th century show) is not in the top (insert arbitrary number)

Yes, some wireless routers can be used as repeaters.

Routers like that are really multi-purposes devices that handle routing, switching, and wireless. If you’re only using a local network, you can still have the wifi network and all your devices communicate through that. You just won’t have internet access.

With out the router/switch, the cable’s usefullness is reduced - at least in the networking application we’re talking about (the cable itself is incredibly usesful for many other things besides ethernet). You can connect (most) devices directly together for communication, they’ll just self assign an IP address.

In less words, you can have a network with just a wireless router and no cable, but you can’t have a network with only a cable and no router (well, you can’t with ‘normal people’ devices)(also you don’t need a router for a local network, only a switch - but the home versions are often combo devices and just called a router).

Imagine their entire family has no idea where the medal came from, but like 12 random people on the internet have the full story.

Someone knew you were a vegetarian, served you chicken broth with out saying anything, and then later acted surprised you ate it anyway? Wtf?

That’s a good idea. The “probably” really is forced. Especially the second one. I think the “punchline” works better if the serious tension isn’t broken early.

I DM’d you an edit I made, removing “probably”.

I thought about posting it here, but I don’t think we should get in the habit of editing people’s coimcs to our liking and sharing them, probably.

It’s over 8000!

Consent is consent. It’s not exclusive to sexual activities.

Extreme comparisons like this have been used since the dawn of time to draw attention to a smaller problems. Just because it’s smaller problem, doesn’t mean it’s not a problem.

In fact, there’s nothing in this comic that specifically compares scraping AI to sexual consent. Sure the “ugly” guy is pretty stereotypical of how we represent rapists, but that’s just a common association we share, not reality (I have no doubt the artist is fully aware of this).

If we really want to get into this, we can talk about the AI scrapping being done across social media that is adding children to the data set. Do you think everyone ai generating images of children has good intentions? Think their parents give consent for that “use case” when they posted the pictures to Facebook years ago? It’s disgusting and should not be dismissed because “its as bad as the real crime”.

Oops, I wasn’t really doing the math as I went

Originally I was adding up to your 10x + a adding in bunch extra for flock, but somepoint my brain switch that 10x to 10%. Oh well, the specific numbers dont really matter.

I think greater responsibility should be placed on the department to encourage firing. If the burden is mostly on the officer, than the department bean counters won’t care as long the officer can write more “valid” tickets to offset the bogus ones.

Its also like if a waiter drops a tray of food on someone causing injury. Who is financially responsible to the injured person, the business or waiter? I think most of would agree that the business is. The business is fully within their rights to fire that waiter, but they can’t withhold pay for the damages. If the business can prove the tray was intentionally thrown, then they can sue the waiter. But, the injured party should never have to talk to the waiter.

Should the be the same for an officer, if they make a mistake it’s on the department to make it right with the affected parties. If the department proves the officer maliciously broke protocol or law, then they can sue them separately. The victim of the officer’s actions should be made “whole” by the department, then the department and officer can figure it out on their own.

Break it down; 2% cop 5% department 25% flock 2x cop 5x department 25x flock

The extra 20 from flock goes back to taxpayers who had to pay the department’s portion.

You could argue it wasn’t destruction of property and get the charges reduced.

You’ll still get slapped with vandalism or something, but shouldn’t be as bad as destroying the unit.

It’s the same with another popular video industry, people thinks that’s all normal and expect the same of their partners.

I tired this recipe, not the same. It’s missing a dash of love.

I love pineapple on pizza, but I only get it if getting slices for my self or with someone else that likes it.

If ordering blind for a group, it’s 1 cheese and 1 pepperoni. If I’m giving the group options it’s pick between cheese, supreme, meat lovers and pepperoni (if any one can’t eat meat, cheese is forced). If they can’t decide, fuck it we’re getting pineapple /s

deleted by creator

Poor lad never grew up to be man, died of dysentery.

If I’m reading the clipboard part right, and seems people on the forms are thinking the same;

If an app can only access clipboard content that it set, does that mean we can’t copy/paste between apps? That would be ridiculous. Does the act of pressing “paste” over right the block, and GrapheneOS will only block the background access apps have?

I like IOS approach, where it asks you before pasting “this app is trying to copy from another app”, and you can allow or decline it. But it is really annoying sometimes.

Just use the pool, all drains go to the same place.

Also if that’s the only toilet, he’s going to finally get there and find an audience member there who finished their businesses long ago, but is sitting there doom scrolling tiktocs until their feet go numb.

“So just because we shop at the same store, we know each other?”