Such an underated show, honestly if someone rebooted this one I’d be okay with that. Even better if the reboot just redid the 3d cgi with a good budget and left the rest.

Not as bad as seeing “Zolo” in the wild

Great, first offense is 1%, doubles each time time. For the 16th ticket offemce it would be 65,536%.

Clearly that’s impossible for one person to pay off, so every ticket after 5 gets crowd funded by all the people involved in not revoking the license after 5 offences.

To be generous, every 5 years with no new ticket, one offence is removed from the percentage count.

Drunk/impaired driving starts at 5% and quadruples each time, and never goes away. If you get a ticket for drinking and driving at 20, and then again 72, that’s 20%.

I mean…if it stops the exploitation of the “stars”, that’s a net positive. There’s some horror stories out there.

Launch took them all with her when she disappeared.

Someone will probably find a massive vulnerability that affects every version of windows, because why not?

Accountable advertisers? In this economy?

Its gonna have to be case specific. -which as you said, is why it’s not so easy to make law.

If a Taylor Swift doppelganger started claiming to be Taylor Swift and making a scene, then sure the real one should be able to shut that down.

If the doppelganger started her own music career with her own name and music, then Taylor Swift can’t do shit.

If the doppelganger is somehow artificially created (computer generated or elaborate makeup/costume) than it does not have the same rights, and can be shutdown (unless its falls into the parody category, but even then it should be obviously not real).

Great, the phone will be charged and my pockets will be warm.

I think Milo was a lizzard person that forgot humans aren’t very fire resistance.

A copy of Elder Scrolls VI.

Pretty sure when corn memes were popular, I blocked a few accounts that were posting low-effort corn memes every hour or something ridiculous.

I should probably unblock them, but I have no idea who they are anymore. Now they’re mixed in a list of people I don’t want to unblock.

BINGO!

10minute mail! I’ll never get your marketing emails, and I’m a new customer every time!!!

• A meta intro to comment
• Linux
• 69 in user name
• Lemmy.world user

Ahh I’m so close, would you mind adding an improperly formatted spoiler?

Defensive Plants

It’s a mix, and not necessarily limited to older laptops.

You want to stay up to date with security updates as much as possible. Feature updates are not as important, especially if you want the least bugs.

On windows you can defer security and feature updates separately, I typically set 1 week for security and 1 year for feature updates (Assuming they haven’t changed that option again). That’s been enough for me to dodge the data-deleting updates.

For Linux, I don’t think it’s separated as a quick user option so cleanly. You can install the LTS (Long Term Support) version of your distro. The maintainers of that will do security/bug fixes as needed and slowly push feature updates when they are very well tested.

Set your child to highly destructive mode to wreck those signs.

I agree, if an IP is abandoned then someone else should be allowed to do something with it.

For this post I was talking about the game that was already made and distributed, not just the idea or characters.

I’ll use Mario Kart 1 for example, if Nintendo doesn’t sell that game anymore, then the game is made publicly available.

If the IP is still in use that A) doesn’t exclude Mario Kart 1 form becoming available, B) doesn’t allow competitors to sell modern Mario Kart games (trademark) and C) prevents someone from taking a 30 year old game and just reselling it on their store.

IPs are much more messy to handle, as it’s less a final product and more of a concept. Creative rights should stay with the creative people not a publisher.

If Nintendo decides to drop Mario, but the actual creator of Mario still wants to work with a different publisher, they should be able to do that before the IP becomes freely available for anyone to take over.

I like it. If the publisher no longer sells/supports the full game as purchased, then they no longer to get to complain about people pirating it.

I don’t like instantly throwing it public domain, that’s the wrong license to use. I think Creative Common CC BY-NC-SA would be more appropriate. (Credit the original, no commercial use, and any modified/redistributed version must follow same license).

This will prevent xbox from taking all the old PlayStation games, stealing an emulator, and selling them under game pass to people that don’t know those games are freely available.

I’d also add the game must be available as an individual 1-time purchase. If it’s only available as a bundle or subscription service (like game pass), that doesn’t count.