

???
Porn is protected speech?


???
Porn is protected speech?


No. Where is there a date of publication?
You ever seen a chihuahua? Same thing except they are weak af. Pitbulls aren’t different, just strong


You get 4 more employees and your budget goes up? I don’t understand how that ties to your budget? If you are trying to say pay should scale linearly with direct reports then definitely no
Any terrier does that though. The thing is a jack Russell doing it is a joke that a suburban mom can yank to hell and back. A pitbull is 10x the weight and muscle mass of that tiny dog.


deleted by creator


Just FYI, this book seems dated AF. If you want to learn about the insurance industry, there are much better options. These things evolve very quickly. If you’re trying to become an adjuster, it’s probably worthless to waste your time on.


This… doesn’t look real. That’s not language they’d use in that notably broad time frame
Edit: this appears to be one of those “asylums turned haunted house” places. I’d be willing to bet this is a modern document they use for marketing


So uh… don’t click the link to that site they reference


I think the funniest part is you think corporate ownership somehow makes social media worse


You’ve never been in an inpatient mental health facility


Sure but I’m asking if, in the most famous gay street in the US, there are bars that are not “gay bars”


Laws are stupid because people break them
Yes! No laws! Everything should be legal!!!1


Are there non-gay bars on Castro st? Never been to SF but all I know is that’s like the most iconic/historic gay district


This would work perfectly… if we lived in a vacuum with no gravity or other forces acting on the object


Idk who is charging $25+ for a four pack of rechargeable batteries. Maybe the tag is for a different product, like one that included the charger?
Every retail listing I’m seeing of that 4 pack is much less


Did you miss the part where Juliet goes on about “sheathing” a “sword”?
There is not right to view porn. Maybe making it, yes. Although SCOTUS has notably never defined obscenity in terms of porn. And that is as drastic oversimplification of the Ashcroft case.