You are sadly correct. FB should have been smashed into bits 15 years ago for allowing their users to agree to share their address books.

All billionaires are a plague to this planet.

My apologies, it appears this stealing laurels is now a mass phenomenon by the slop fuckers. I was thinking of this incident: https://dnyuz.com/2026/09/10/an-n-y-u-mathematician-clashed-with-openai-over-a-1-million-proof/

The snag was that his collaborator is Levent Alpöge, a mathematician who works at Anthropic.

Dr. Buckmaster said since he and Dr. Alpöge had used both OpenAI and Anthropic tools, […]

I wouldn’t be surprised however, if the scientists mentioned in the OP also used slop tools to get into this situation. And if they did not, their work can’t have been used - unless a peer shared it with the slop fuckers.

Are these the moron mathematicians who worked for Anthropic and brought this entirely upon themselves?

There’s a major distinction there. The support for the genocide of the Palestinians is our fucked up corrupt government. Our new Nazi party however, has way more popular support (at around 20-25%). Not nearly as many Germans are behind Israeli crimes against humanity.

If someone violently dissolves the German state, I’d rather have it be for the things we are actually guilty of. Otherwise please just drop a big doozie on the Reichtstag and let us try again with elections.

I am a total badass! :D golden.

To be fair, yes - I found the Scottish more approachable so far :)

bit of a ridiculous sentiment when there’s so many guides for stuff online that I wouldn’t know which category to put myself in. I definitely didn’t take classes nor read books on it, yet I absolutely took a guided approach.

And you have missed the part where I explicitly mentioned that LLMs are NOT “sapient” or “sentient”, which would preclude “consciousness” also.

I am inclined to believe that people who use the word "sapi*"anything are just very very gullible and/or Dunning-Kruger-victims.

You completely missed the point I made that links understanding and conscience in humans.

I was only speculating, never mind me. So in other words, Eliza is entirely deterministic :)

My main point is that the use of the term “intelligence” to describe sometbing that is absolutely without any understanding, by people who don’t try to sell the snake oil and should have the interests of others in mind, is a disservice to educating people about the dangers.

The theft is built-in and foundational how this technology works

Aye, this is one of the key takeaways.

Another being that the technology is good enough to mass-manipulate people. And for statistically “helpful” surveillance tasks in a totalitarian police state.

It was already difficult to find people who know how to phrase good requirements and / or design an architecture before the slop machines got introduced. It will be so much worse for the next couple of decades, with idiots bullshitting their way past HR into a position.

with biological neurons that produce probabilistic results

Ah, so you understood neurons better than neuroscientists, eh? You have missed the part where no scientist worth their name claims to be able to fully explain how consciousness works and whether or not it affects our decision making.

LLMs are absolutely intelligent.

Okay, I think we’re done here. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

But that doesn’t mean LLM’S don’t fit some of the technical definitions of AI

When faced with slop vendors arguing in bad faith, we shouldn’t get caught up on technicalities. The “technically it is (a subset of) AI” argument is used to sell gullible people solutions that are already getting people killed - and not necessarily those who were gullible enough to believe the “AI” bullshit.

So for LLMs, it should be common sense to call them slop / dangerous bullshit generators and refuse to talk with anyone who sells them as “AI”.

The randomness in Eliza (I never reviewed the code) would have been of the sorts “out of x possible answers indexed starting with zero, do a truncate( ran( 1.0 ) * X ) and select the answer with that index”. But yeah, apart from that it was deterministic. Same input history = same output.

in theory. Need reviewers for that, though.

Nah, Eliza had a programmed logic, all phrases she reacted to had been implemented deterministically by a human. There was no training data.

You misspelled male genital mutilation.

LLMs clap are clap not clap AI clap.

Try to get that into you sycophant brain, and you will understand why this bullshit happens in the first place.

Plagiarism is the core and only mechanism of LLMs that produces anything that people get impressed by. The pre- and postprocessing logic for grammar rules is not the stuff that makes gullible people believe there is “intelligence” involved.

Best of luck!