Thank you for enlightening me, I would have never guessed and intentionally played to that dual meaning, giving you tons of hints to get it.

Because Germany is a republic of former countries, which are accordingly called “Länder” i.e. countries.

Dunno, when I am in public & browsing lemmy & something lewd comes up, I either close lemmy or quickly browse past it. It’s not like I hold my display for other people to see it, nor do I open those posts.

I explicitly said “at least a state”.

If your workplace is a) that sensitive about things, and b) looks over your shoulder, be it on phone screen or by monitoring your web history, then you should probably not be browsing there at all.

Or it won’t. At least not while humans are alive.

Mostly I’m just really fucking sad.

There was such a potential for all of us to live brilliant, flourishing, fulfilling lives.

Same :(

Not sure what your point is and I don’t mean it’s good, but Baden Württemberg is at least a state governed by the green.

Anyways I think we should move all elections to mid summer - that should get some people to consider climate issues when voting.

You think German politicians care?

1. it’s not AI, it’s statistical word prediction with ZERO understanding of context
2. yes. statistical word prediction can be better than some idiot programmers. But I don’t compare my kitchen machine skills with those of a toddler either.

¡Sí, por cierto! :)

Spanish loves to turn acronyms backwards: NATO-OTAN, UNO-ONU

We can definitely use AI to write good code

Get a different job. Now!

Bold of you to assume my latest bedtimes and earliest mornings don’t overlap :p

I’m not diving into hairsplitting here - there’s an academical field that researched AI, and as part of that field, machine learning is investigated. That doesn’t mean there’s anything intelligent about the core mechanism of LLMs. The part that has many people confusing it for “intelligence” is that with actual - deterministic - algorithms, the in and output are filtered to and from tokens, according to grammar rules of languages, to avoid the most glaringly obvious garbled output.

Just another tuesday in the corrupt union :(

See you next tuesday suckers.

So far, yes, seems we can say things that are basically objectively true.

I sometimes use just the quotes for brevity, but I mostly use “slop”. I hate the implicit suggestion there’s any kind of intelligence/understanding involved in generating the output. That combined with the admittedly impressive looking/sounding results leads people to believe it’s actually accurate & reliable, which it isn’t.

Only by the definition of people who try to sell this bullshit.

This post isn’t memeing with Magastan in the picture though.