• 1 Post
  • 809 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle






  • If you think people make unpredictable mistakes all the time, you shouldn’t be driving a motorized vehicle. Because you clearly do not know what to anticipate. Do unpredictable mistakes happen? Sure thing. But they are the rare exception, and almost all the time an aware driver will be cautious about situations so as not to get caught unaware.


  • You don’t understand the basics of safety rules.

    Using bullshit language like “super human behavior” doesn’t make your point any less stupid.

    Diagnostics are a valid application of machine learning - as a second check, after a qualified radiologist has reviewed the images. Not instead of the human, nor even as a first step, because it will impact the effort a human puts into a review if they already get a pre-analysis.

    With your attitude, you will kill people.


  • Human drivers: people die due to reckless driving and human mistakes - and in most situations a good driver can anticipate a lot of dangers and avoid them. ML “assistants” getting control over cars: people die of unpredictable mis-assessments of inputs vs. outputs, and there’s no way to anticipate any danger or try to avoid it.

    People who advocate for non-deterministic systems taking control in cars are irresponsible and have blood on their hands.


  • “noticably better” than what? You need to ask yourself that question. Machine learning solutions should never be in control of any irreversible actions. Slowing down a car due to perceived danger? Okay, worst case driver has to accelerate again (emergency braking decisions must not be made by such a system either to avoid being rear-ended). Swerving to avoid an obstacle? Absolutely not!

    As I said in another comment: There are driving assistants that work deterministically. Anything else can give visual or auditory clues but shouldn’t be allowed to control much if anything else.

    The question of how good an ML system is, is irrelevant as they are non-deterministic by nature, and their legitimate use cases are elsewhere.







  • Well - we have a saying in German: “Fragen kostet nichts” - asking doesn’t cost anything. At least you tried then, worst they can say is “no”. Expect that, and who knows, maybe you get a surprise.

    Maybe they’ll let you work with a “technical device” that you administrate yourself, while for access to company resources you still have to use the corporate vanilla computer.





  • In any case, I am a software engineer and have never had the ability to negotiate my contract to that extent.

    Have you ever tried? This kind of negotiation unfortunately typically requires a job change, employers are really really bad at understanding how valuable it is to motivate employees at little to no cost to them.