• FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Solar panels require mining and non-renewable materials to make, and are economically non-recyclable, meaning they end up in landfill.

    • WafflesTasteGood [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      economically non-recyclable

      Solar panels are almost entirely recyclable. The same is true for batteries used for energy storage. It not being “economical” is a capitalism problem and not a renewable energy problem.

    • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      This is bordering on miss information. It’s a tiny fraction of resources compared to what we are currently extracting to produce energy and discarded solar panels are pretty safe (unless it’s American solar panels that sometimes contain heavy metals like cadmium).

      And the neoliberal answer to solar panels being economically non-recycleable is to increase the cost to putting them in landfills until they are economically recyclable. Even if it’s just grinding them into dust to use as a filler in concrete or something.

      edit, some rough calculations:

      20kg of solar panels produce about as much electricity as 5 tons of coal.

    • Feed_el_Castro [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Solar panels require mining and non-renewable materials to make

      All human activity has an impact, replacing fossil fuels by solar is extremely positive

      and are economically non-recyclable

      Their lifespan is 30+ years easily. Recycling may very well become economically feasible once we start generating millions of tons of solar panel residue, large scale operation is a huge aspect of profitability