Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast … as it gets better, we’ll become too dependent.

“all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,”

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Smarter how? Synthetic benchmarks?

      Because I’ve heard the opposite from users and bloggers.

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So you want me to provide some evidence that it’s getting smarter, but you can’t provide any that it’s getting worse other than anecdotal evidence?

        What evidence would you accept?

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Any significant shift in the model, or a complete restructuralization of the approach.

              As it is, it won’t grow anywhere.

              • FreedomAdvocate
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                So you’ve got access to all this stuffs source code and know what has and hasn’t changed with every update?

                  • FreedomAdvocate
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    They’re constantly advertising updates to these chat bots in what they can do.