The Trump administration has, for the first time ever, built a searchable national citizenship data system.

The tool, which is being rolled out in phases, is designed to be used by state and local election officials to give them an easier way to ensure only citizens are voting. But it was developed rapidly without a public process, and some of those officials are already worrying about what else it could be used for.

NPR is the first news organization to report the details of the new system.

For decades, voting officials have noted that there was no national citizenship list to compare their state lists to, so to verify citizenship for their voters, they either needed to ask people to provide a birth certificate or a passport — something that could disenfranchise millions — or use a complex patchwork of disparate data sources.

  • FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So you’re admitting the democrats want illegals to vote in elections?

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Democrats? 😂 Buddy, this is a bipartisan event. If the city counsel decides what to do with the initiatives, why are you blaming the Dems? That the democrats are fine with that speaks to compassion for small issues that betters lives.

      I hope you realize this doesn’t mean electing officials.

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        You literally said “what democrats want” in your last paragraph of your last post you turnip, and said that they want illegals to vote in them.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, what lower case democrats (and by extension capital D Democrats allegedly) want and believe in as a core tenet is for the public to vote on small scale measures that affect them directly. Shocker, I know. But tell me, did you think they meant elections instead of these issues? Because you’re glossing over the scale of these initiatives quite conveniently.

          Also, should my country stop taking young people’s votes? Imagine children voting to give an opinion for the local council to hear! I may just clutch my pearls thinking they’re electing officials.