return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoMAGA Puts Wikipedia in Its Crosshairsgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up1726arrow-down17
arrow-up1719arrow-down1external-linkMAGA Puts Wikipedia in Its Crosshairsgizmodo.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square153fedilink
minus-squareFreedomAdvocatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·20 hours agoUnfortunately that’s not how it’s used. It’s used as a primary source most of the time even on here.
minus-squareundrwater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 hours agoSure, but many will cite a news organization’s opinion page as fact. Is this a good reason for any administration to target opinion pages? The administration is supposed to represent the Constitution, not attack it. Remember your constitution; particularly the 1st amendment.
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-22 hours agoThat’s the issue of the user.
Unfortunately that’s not how it’s used. It’s used as a primary source most of the time even on here.
Sure, but many will cite a news organization’s opinion page as fact. Is this a good reason for any administration to target opinion pages?
The administration is supposed to represent the Constitution, not attack it.
Remember your constitution; particularly the 1st amendment.
That’s the issue of the user.