• justaman123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    From what I can tell the print head is built into the cartridge and that’s the hard part for printer technology.

    But I think you might be right depending only on the hp cartridge will open them up to cease and desist. If they make it also use a cannon cartridge that also has a print head then I think they might be ok

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think the fact that it’s hardware will prevent any cease and desist (or rather the legal teeth behind them). It’s not licensed IP but a physical product.

      Like I think of it more like 3rd party car parts. Depending on the part, they often need to target specific makes, models, and even years of cars. It’s why so many parts have had encrypted handshakes with the main computer (John Deere is famous for this but I understand some cars are doing it for some parts these days, too) because they couldn’t just stop them in the courts.

      I’m not sure that this is how it will work but hopefully. Also selling ink cartridges is how HP makes its money and it uses some of that money to subsidize the printers themselves, so they might like that this printer sells more of those rather than moving entirely away from their ecosystem.

      • justaman123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, ultimately it probably does end up selling more cartridges over time. Like even with the refillable ones you still gotta replace them eventually because of the print heads. Honestly, the more I think about it I think I’m just gonna continue to not print things out at my house and just use the Kinko’s when I need to for a dime a page. I mean how much do I actually print out anyway. This is the same math I did when decided not to buy another ink cartridge last time my printer stopped working