• Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you were accused of murdering and taken to the hospital for a blood test with a lawyer present people would lose their minds

    But suspected drunk drivers it happens all the time without a lawyer present

    • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because these are two different things, if you’re accused of murder they can use whatever you say against you, but in case of drunk driving it doesn’t matter what you say, what matter is the results of the test.

      • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        The courts have ruled we have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

        If you do that they then simply charge you with another crime.

    • healthetank@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      How many other crimes are directly defined with a time-sensitive impairment?

      If they allowed you to both call a lawyer and wait for them to arrive you could arrange for your lawyer to be a) 2+hrs away, b)alseep or c)any other time delaying tactic.

      I agree I don’t like the status quo, but if you have a reasonable alternative that still allows them to catch people who are drunk driving, I’m all ears.

      • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        Miranda Rights give you the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney

        These rights go out the window because if you exercise them they simply charge you refusing to comply which carries the same penalty as a drunk driving conviction