• dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    While I agree with you, I feel like the more effective way to reduce risk on the road is to take the implications here all the way to their logical conclusions. Some people ARE a little slower, a little less reactive, more likely to take risks, or less capable behind the wheel.

    It seems to me that the testing process to pilot a personal road missile ought to take a page from this and be more frequent and more strict.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sort of, but I believe someone found that the actual risk isn’t so much in the low reaction time or impulse control, it’s in the change between the inebriated person’s usual faculties and what they’re experiencing under the influence of alcohol. Drivers who are used to having a 1-second reaction time are likely to continue driving as if they have a 1-second reaction time even if their actual speed is more like 1.75-second due to alcohol.

      You’re not going to get any argument from me that it’s insane we allow anyone to pilot a four-thousand-pound vehicle after only a single one-hour test, and retain that permission indefinitely, though.

    • Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I agree, but that doesn’t really work outside a city in the USA, given how little we invest in public transit. The entire economy in outlying areas would go to shit because everyone has to drive an hour to get to work.