• They have been found to have been altering the contents of the archived articles.
  • They have DDoSed a server using our browsers when we visit their site
  • Wikipedia has blacklisted it
  • It’s DNS is banned widely

Guidance published … asked editors to help remove and replace links to the following domain names used by the archive site: archive.today, archive.is, archive.ph, archive.fo, archive.li, archive.md, and archive.vn. The guidance says editors can remove Archive.today links when the original source is still online and has identical content;

Recommended alternatives include: Internet Archive Ghostarchive Megalodon

The Wikipedia guidance points out that the Internet Archive and its website, Archive.org, are “uninvolved with and entirely separate from archive.today.” The Internet Archive is a nonprofit based in the US.

ArsTechnica Source

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    In these cases I still consider archive.is (etc.) to be better than nothing. Also, the fact that archive.org is based in the USA is a concern. It could be forced to censor or delete content, or even be forcibly shut down.

    • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      indeed, there are many blacklisted/non-viewable urls in the wayback machine sadly. and it really doesn’t work well with dynamic js-based paged

    • antonim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      As opposed to all the other countries that can’t censor and delete content or shut websites down?

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a question of the political climate in the countries. The USA is a bit extreme at the moment.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Compared to?

          For many of the people I talk to, that can be assumed. Here, however…

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed. Being unable to get important info to people could be a bigger problem which is why I’d probably keep using them.

    • Deep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      misinformation is not better than nothing if youre an idiot. dummies and noobs will take the info as fact