I think of it as being made by one of few really trustworthy organizations in tech.

For some reason all I see is a picture, not the article. Here’s the link in case anyone else has the same problem:

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-us-military/

For some reason all I see is a picture, not the article. Here’s the link in case anyone else has the same problem:

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-us-military/

The Liberals are determined to turn Canada into a surveillance state and share data with other “eyes” countries including the USA. This government is not looking to protect Canadians. And they haven’t taken the objections on board, as evidenced by their statements that they need to “define” encryption, and that “the new amendments will aim to align the bill’s encryption provisions with US counterparts.” How can you look at all the history of the USA spying on its own citizens and think “Yep, Canada should copy that”? Not a government that’s serving Canadians.

Mine (Liberal) sent a form letter that stated strong support for it and claimed (falsely) that this just brings Canada into line with what its allies have already done.

Rent-seeking has entirely replaced innovation in modern capitalism.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260526234922/https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/26/uk-visa-portal-spilled-thousands-of-applicants-passports-and-selfies-online-and-hasnt-fixed-the-leak/

https://web.archive.org/web/20260522181109/https://www.thedailybeast.com/damning-pentagon-leak-reveals-us-using-more-missile-defense-to-protect-israel-than-israel/

WiFi jamming underpants.

In that case, carry on.

“These graduates are actually both going to be a big part of driving that progress and also dealing with the impact,” he added, referring to AI.

Out of context it sounds like a threat, but in connect it just sounds like vacuous CEO-speak, designed to respond to the question with some words while not actually answering the question.

Women’s rights and Transgender rights are in conflict

Some of us would strongly disagree with this fundamental premise of yours. You state it like it’s a solid basis on which these matters should be debated, but it’s actually a controversial point that could only emerge as the conclusion of an argument. It needs justification at least.

deleted by creator

Why is it a win, and for whom?

Possibly both. Signal will want to protect themselves legally.

Only a day or two left to write to your MP and object to it.

No, Trump explicitly said the USA couldn’t pay for medicare, medicaid or children’s daycare because the money is needed for wars. And there’s still Greenland and Canada to invade, plus whoever else gets on the list.

https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/did-trump-say-no-healthcare-we-are-fighting-wars-75e7d0

VPNs don’t prevent a device from announcing its real location. And they protect you from a MITM at the ISP but not at the VPN provider, so you just switch who you trust. VPNs also don’t do anything to help with the browser fingerprinting that companies use to track you around the web. From the point of view of the services and sites you connect to, all a VPN does is change your IP address, and the IP address may not be a big part of how they track you in the first place. VPNs alone do not improve privacy much at all.

What VPNs do is shield your traffic metadata from inspection by the network hops between your client and the VPN provider (though the content is almost always enxrypted even without the VPN), and change your apparent location for any service that is exclusively using IP-based geolocation.

Maybe there wasn’t one.

One way to do that would be to stop the endless misdeeds.