- 508 Posts
- 1.21K Comments
232·4 days agoNot thinking is an essential skill for surviving in the technofascist world they’re building for us.
Yes you almost certainly can. It’s less painful than you might imagine. I used Gmail since it was launched, and now that account is unused except for a couple of mailing lists I don’t care about. It just takes a bit of time, but you can do it bit by bit.
There is a little bit of video in there of the car going quite fast, but the guy seems to mostly be filming the seat and the floor, so you only glimpse movement out of the window for a moment or two.
I think of it as being made by one of few really trustworthy organizations in tech.
7·9 days agoFor some reason all I see is a picture, not the article. Here’s the link in case anyone else has the same problem:
10·9 days agoFor some reason all I see is a picture, not the article. Here’s the link in case anyone else has the same problem:
The Liberals are determined to turn Canada into a surveillance state and share data with other “eyes” countries including the USA. This government is not looking to protect Canadians. And they haven’t taken the objections on board, as evidenced by their statements that they need to “define” encryption, and that “the new amendments will aim to align the bill’s encryption provisions with US counterparts.” How can you look at all the history of the USA spying on its own citizens and think “Yep, Canada should copy that”? Not a government that’s serving Canadians.
Mine (Liberal) sent a form letter that stated strong support for it and claimed (falsely) that this just brings Canada into line with what its allies have already done.
Rent-seeking has entirely replaced innovation in modern capitalism.
WiFi jamming underpants.
In that case, carry on.
“These graduates are actually both going to be a big part of driving that progress and also dealing with the impact,” he added, referring to AI.
Out of context it sounds like a threat, but in connect it just sounds like vacuous CEO-speak, designed to respond to the question with some words while not actually answering the question.
412·14 days agoWomen’s rights and Transgender rights are in conflict
Some of us would strongly disagree with this fundamental premise of yours. You state it like it’s a solid basis on which these matters should be debated, but it’s actually a controversial point that could only emerge as the conclusion of an argument. It needs justification at least.
deleted by creator
Why is it a win, and for whom?
Possibly both. Signal will want to protect themselves legally.
The article is worth reading. It describes what kind of credit scoring system does exist in China, and what is sensationalized Western propaganda.