• python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    Fuck those glasses. But also, my brain can’t let go of the question of “How would I feel if I saw a woman wearing these?”. And honestly I’m not sure??? Like you could make an argument that at least they would deter creepy men?? Anyone got any thoughts on that?

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Women can be creeps too. It’s less common but there are still plenty.

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    Ah hell. My only pair of sunglasses is a 5 year old pair of raybans.

    I’d better not get “pervert glasses” shouted at me.

  • swooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m never buying Ray Bans again. I don’t want to be associated, fuck Ray Bans for taking that cash.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    also it has the stigma of Zuckerberg using his companies as datamining, spying, right wing peddling platforms. his name was enough to derail anything that comes out of meta.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      100%. I’ve been saying it for years that at the end of the day, the only punishment that actually works is the public shaming.

      Bring back the public perp walks. March the criminal through the streets with a big banner announcing their crime, and then leave them them in a public cell in the middle of town for a few days with their name on it, their crime, and no privacy so that people can come and see them.

      A few days of that will do more to cure recidivism than any jail you can name.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s nice to see no one learned anything from Google Glass. This is why we’re fucked as a species…

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      ive only seen it once it public and then never after that day. i think people got the message the moment articles came out about it. but Zuckerborg intends to push this out regardless.

      • cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        I dealt with a couple that I was proud of.

        The first time I saw them was an object I talked to on the train. It was the line that went to/from the airport, so you get a broader class mix. The conversation was nice at first, friendly, there were jokes. Then it showed me the glasses-it was already wearing actual glasses so it explained what they were and started talking about capacity of the charging case thing. They were still a very new thing, I was tired and not as aggressive as I should have been, so when it took them out and said what they were I just said ‘fuck you.’, put on my best scowl, and walked away. When it came up I reached into my purse and gave it my best cold ‘you want to get the fuck away from me.’. I left and switched cars at the next stop, and told people as I left that the guy at the other end is a glasshole as I left, in a way that was clearly just to them.

      • S4m_S3p1l@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Who woulda’ thought suckerberg - the man responsible for running intelligence ops on billions of devices in broad daylight, would be outta touch with evolving cultural norms!

  • roboaddy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I just don’t understand why they even tried. Google already proved in 2013 that people think you’re an asshole for wearing things like this, even having the term “glasshole” come about.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    How do we feel about flock or similar camera networks around the world? Like yeah a dude with cameras on his face is one issue and then there’s the systemic distribution of millions of cameras which is arguably worse but feels more normal to many.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I think the glasses are worse since they will film you up close, anywhere, and end up on social media to laugh at or to jerk off to.

      This is a product that should not be allowed to be distributed to the public. But we live in an age where decency and respect for others is low.

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah it’s a more jarring and immediate concern than the amorphous state level data collection and profiling concern of distributed systems although both boil down to privacy concerns. Like its one thing to have a dash cam in your car or a household security camera or even for a business to have internal and external security cameras it’s another thing all together for the state to have a distributed camera network accurately tracking everything you’re doing or for an Individual to be illegally recording in private locations to make compromising content.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s a whole different issue. I cannot choose to install flock cameras in my city, but I can choose to buy and wear meta glasses or not.

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        Yes and no. Like towns have town halls where such issues are voted on or debated. There are most definitely actions individuals and more importantly communities can take to stop the spread of distributed surveillance. There are already laws about filming in private locations aka it’s currently illegal for someone to be filming in a public restroom or in your house or in a business they don’t own.

    • Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Does it? Most people I know on all sides of the political spectrum absolutely dispose the mass surveillance and have openly done so since cameras at traffic lights became a widespread thing.