I bought a datacenter GPU that doesn't fit in a normal motherboard, macgyvered the fan with jumper wires, and now I'm running a model that ties with Claude Sonnet 4.6 on benchmarks, all for £200.
For well-known authors with a large corpus of prior writing, it’s simple to run a style match analysis, if you wish to demonstrate that they lazily used generative AI to write a particular piece.
But for all the knee-jerk “ai slop” accusations I see on almost every post now, the only justification most offer is that it’s obvious, which sounds like “I can tell by the pixels.”
I detailed several of the indications in another comment. If you’re too blind to see the very obvious indicators then oh boy. That’s what makes it AI slop. They don’t even bother trying to hide it. It’s like bad CGI, there’s no need to say “I can tell by the pixels” because it’s transparently obvious.
For well-known authors with a large corpus of prior writing, it’s simple to run a style match analysis, if you wish to demonstrate that they lazily used generative AI to write a particular piece.
But for all the knee-jerk “ai slop” accusations I see on almost every post now, the only justification most offer is that it’s obvious, which sounds like “I can tell by the pixels.”
I detailed several of the indications in another comment. If you’re too blind to see the very obvious indicators then oh boy. That’s what makes it AI slop. They don’t even bother trying to hide it. It’s like bad CGI, there’s no need to say “I can tell by the pixels” because it’s transparently obvious.