• Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      In a console age of chasing only graphics it was definitely a creative approach.

      They just saw how bad the Wii-U did and went “what if the console was inside the screen instead?”

      • Carrot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The Switch was innovative? So much so that, upon seeing it’s success, literally everyone copied them in one form or another?

        • TotalCourage007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Its not innovative to smash controllers onto a smartphone device. What is innovative was their optimization for mobile gaming. Its similar to saying valve is innovative for selling other peoples games.

          • Carrot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean if you’re being that reductive, sure, a handheld gaming system wouldn’t be innovative. The innovation comes from a console that switches from handheld mode and a docked TV mode. The innovation is a pair of controllers that work both as the built-in handheld controllers, and controllers that can be used when the console is docked. The innovation is that the controllers can behave either as a pair of controllers or a single controller. Sure, they aren’t super significant innovations, but it’s more than you see from other consoles. I don’t see the similarity in your last statement, but I guess I could be missing something.