not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1166arrow-down14
arrow-up1162arrow-down1imageso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down2·edit-27 days agoThis graph is about 10 years old. The peso is pretty stable. Only lost like halve it’s value in the recent 3 years.
minus-squareBlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·7 days agoThe graph is still approaching zero, it’s only stable because it’s so close already
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·7 days agoIt is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale. A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
minus-squarenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-26 days agoit went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·6 days agoThat’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.
This graph is about 10 years old. The peso is pretty stable.
Only lost like halve it’s value in the recent 3 years.
The graph is still approaching zero, it’s only stable because it’s so close already
It is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale.
A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
it went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
That’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.