Because AI edits are far easier and quicker for most people than Photoshop, with the end result being worsened by slop generated to fill the space of cropped out elements.
But Ai can also do it “correctly”, and humans can also do a terrible photoshop job, you need to be skilled to be able to use it correctly. It also has a host of automated correction tools, which is indistinguishable from Ai.
Ai isn’t the problem with this issue, it’s the editing itself. This is just gonna make the rest of the issues come more to the forefront, they aren’t going to allow human editing and not Ai, that would just be going backwards.
You say to accept imperfection, but a particular type of editing would be okay? That’s hypocrisy.
Human editing is a problem too, but AI is making such edits more commonplace and harder to notice. Any policy changes should therefore bar both types of editing, but AI edits are a far greater threat because one doesn’t need to be skilled to make them.
Because AI edits are far easier and quicker for most people than Photoshop, with the end result being worsened by slop generated to fill the space of cropped out elements.
But Ai can also do it “correctly”, and humans can also do a terrible photoshop job, you need to be skilled to be able to use it correctly. It also has a host of automated correction tools, which is indistinguishable from Ai.
Ai isn’t the problem with this issue, it’s the editing itself. This is just gonna make the rest of the issues come more to the forefront, they aren’t going to allow human editing and not Ai, that would just be going backwards.
You say to accept imperfection, but a particular type of editing would be okay? That’s hypocrisy.
Human editing is a problem too, but AI is making such edits more commonplace and harder to notice. Any policy changes should therefore bar both types of editing, but AI edits are a far greater threat because one doesn’t need to be skilled to make them.