FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 days agoBane Masklemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1385arrow-down113
arrow-up1372arrow-down1imageBane Masklemmy.dbzer0.comFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 days agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-26 days agoAnd so dampening is fine Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·6 days agono, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. “dampening” has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is “damping”. it doesn’t dampen your voice, it damps it.
And so dampening is fine
Even if we were using it in the technical sense of would be fine
no, you even highlighted that it is proscribed. “dampening” has only one meaning, which is to make wet. the word is “damping”. it doesn’t dampen your voice, it damps it.