• Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    There are hundreds of studies on exactly this topic in disciplines from economics to public health. They are most common on the topic of universal healthcare and ensuring timely access.

    The consensus has always been that charging a nominal fee (e.g. £5) drastically reduced unnecessary usage and increases access across the population. Policy proposals generally recommend for a set number of free appointments per year for the subset of the population below an income threshold.

    Just search for it.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Buses, and this might shock you, aren’t as sensitive to waste as other systems. If you need to get from point a to point b and using the bus is faster than, say, walking, then it wasn’t a wasted trip. And if it wasn’t shorter, the person who wasted their time is the one punished for wasting their time.

      So, no, vague unlisted studies about other systems isn’t relevant here.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s directly relevant and buses are just as susceptible to waste and scarcity of capacity as any other system.

        Sorry reality doesn’t agree with your internally constructed and parasocially reinforced narrative.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          Maybe people would believe you more if you actually posted something that actually backs up your claim rather than repeating the same “the facts are on my side” claim and resorting to ad hominems 🤷

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      £5 is not a “nominal fee” if you take multiple buses a week to get to multiple places, transport over a month could add up to hundreds of pounds

      A nominal fee would be like 5 pence

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bullshit. I lived in countries with both fully free healthcare and with a small fee, and if anything the system works better in the countries where it’s free.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        Cool, data and scholarship disagree with you. But, I’m sure that we’ve all been enlightened by your layman’s opinion on a well-studied topic.

        • Coldcell@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Are the data and scholarships in the room with us now?

          I’ve read 16 independantly verified deep studies across multiple economic states that proved conclusively that buses being free increased the productivity of a populace, reduced time taken off, and directly increased lifespans of the participants. I had a link to these studies somewhere… hold on…

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Have have absolutely no conception of reality whatsoever if you consider £5 a nominal fee. None whatsoever. Of course you don’t understand buses. You don’t use them. At all.