• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    HS2 is clearly just a deliberate money pit at this point, there’s no other reason a relatively short line like that could out cost the entire EU wide rail refurbishment project by a factor of almost 2.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      They decided to make it a high speed line. This requires much wider curves, limiting how many obstacles could be avoided. In turn this led to expensive court battles and hideously expensive mitigation, such as the £100m bat tunnel.

      Nimbys with Tory connections got the lines put into very expensive tunnels under the Chilterns. This was last minute and incurred an additional billion pounds.

      Very high property prices, and poorer ground than expected leading to £5bn in extra remediation.

      An overly-generous redundancy scheme at HS2 Ltd.

      Deferrment of some elements such as the section to Euston incurred inflation.

      The government decided to demand a much longer guarantee period than is normal - the time after completion in which the constructor is liable for any repairs - which bumped up the price of everything.