• mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Don’t be a contrarian for the sake of argument. If your reading comprehension is so good you’d know the title is intentionally sensationalized intentionally using large numbers to make it look and sound like they’re always at the upper limits.

    God. I bet you’re insufferable irl aren’t you?

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The literal wording of the title is “up to”. You’re criticizing it for cherry picking when it’s… not.

      If there’s a contrarian here, it’s certainly not me.

      Nice personal attack though!

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Ya. Having “up to” in the title isn’t some magical phrase that excuses the sensational title. And simply claiming that it does isn’t sufficient.

        YSK: Not all raw chicken is the same some is enhanced with a saltwater solution

        This is an example of a neutral title that doesn’t sensationalize and enhance clicks.

        And you started the personal attacks with reading comprehension shtick. So don’t get offended all of the sudden.