• KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Train stations definitely have less bullshit, but it’s a 5h trip vs a 1h trip in this case. I could have spent 3 hours in the airport before the flight each way and added 30 minutes to get from the train station to the airport and back, and still saved time by flying.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I have one hour flights (three hours including time traveling to and from airport) that are 24 hour train trips. Twenty six including time traveling to and from the station. Monetary costs are equivalent. Like, some areas aren’t conducive to rail.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Well I certainly acknowledge our train system sucks. Try comparing LA-to-NYC times. Or LA to Pittsburgh. Or DC. Just adding to the difficulty, there seem to be 2 completely separate systems (still both Amtrak) that you have to change over in Chicago. And the 3 hour layover isn’t considered reliable enough to book as one trip, you have to plan to spend the night there.