destructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoGuess what crashes even less than driverless cars: fucking trains and trams, that's whatdriving.caexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down115cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1504arrow-down1external-linkGuess what crashes even less than driverless cars: fucking trains and trams, that's whatdriving.cadestructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square52fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squarepulsewidth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·2 days agoAlso, humans driving cars, because it’s pretty easy to have fewer ‘crashes’ when you just omit a heap of crashes. “the analysis excluded minor incidents involving Waymos that would likely not have been reported to the police had a human been driving,”
minus-squareZetta@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 day ago¯_(ツ)_/¯ I get your point but also I get their point, they are trying to make the data comparable to the data they are comparing too. It just so happens it makes them look better too.
Also, humans driving cars, because it’s pretty easy to have fewer ‘crashes’ when you just omit a heap of crashes.
¯_(ツ)_/¯ I get your point but also I get their point, they are trying to make the data comparable to the data they are comparing too. It just so happens it makes them look better too.