• FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 天前

    “there’s no expectation of privacy in public places”

    In the US, the judicial system is shifting about that. Slowly! But it is. There is a name for this legal theory which I forgot now. The idea is, once you string together enough individual data points, they enjoy 4A protection. Even if any one by itself wouldn’t rise to 4A level. That means while you don’t have an expectation of privacy, you DO have an expectation the gov won’t use all that data to surveil you without a warrant.

    Ofc, that only binds the government. It does NOT bind private co’s! Google. Meta. A million data brokers. Flock! So it only addresses part of the prob. Is it good? Yes! But we also need protection against private collectors. In meatspace, we cannot block Flocks and randos with smart glasses. Or the total data fusion that results.

    • pucker4676@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 天前

      Ah, good. The government will finally start obeying the law. I’m sure Edward can come home now.

      • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 小时前

        This is a logical fallacy. I’m not picking on you specifically, because that way of thinking is all over social media. But it is not a useful or productive way to think about the world.