[purple, happy]
You know how sometimes you don’t want to keep consuming media after finding out who wrote it?

[blue, a finger raised]
Sure, people would say you’re having a hard time separating the art from the artist

[purple, distraught]
Well the other day I was reading this book called “Mein Kampf” which was alright, then I looked up the author’s bio on Wikipedia and… damn

[blue, blasé]


https://thebad.website/comic/advanced_media_literacy

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    You shouldn’t and cannot separate the art from the artist. That’s not how art works.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You can. I think what you’re referring to is that you can get a deeper meaning of the art by learning about the artist, but you can still separate the art.

      This comic is a perfect example. You can separate Mein Kampf from the artist, and guess what? It’s still a terrible piece of art. Bingo bango, all it took was media literacy.

      If you couldn’t separate the art from the artist to dismiss art then you would be saying that if someone has evil beliefs their soul is evil and they are not capable of creating good art. Which is a heinous belief. Bad people can make good art.

    • luminish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You can however like and dislike different things an artist and an art does. Its just siloing the stuff you dislike away as if the context never matters is simply wilful ignorance.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Why? I totally don’t care who made it, when I like what is made.

      So, teach me the ways of the art and how it works, please.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        An artist is not a machine who just prints stuff. When an artist makes something, regardless of what it is they’re making, their feelings, experiences, teachings, worldview, and personal beliefs/opinions shape the art they make.

        If you take those things away you have an AI generator. No music, writing, poetry, rapping, drawing, painting, or even corporate logo design can exist without the events, influences, and decisions of the one making these things.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          An artist is not a machine who just prints stuff

          No. But I didn’t question that. I just don’t care if this music I like was made by AI, Adolf Hitler or Or two gay penguins. I value art for what it is to me, not what someone wants it to be. I don’t look behind the curtain.

          If you take those things away you have an AI generator

          Nah. I am the living proof. I consume the front, pay for it (mostly) and everyone is happy. And behold! The artist is still there, even without me caring. Might he do whatever he does to create the stuff I like.