• protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    No way in hell we’re facing an extinction event. Unimaginable human suffering, probably, but humanity will persist.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The Great Filter doesn’t necessarily mean we need to go extinct as a species. Destroying our capability of advanced technology is enough. Which it certainly will.

    • edible_funk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isolated pockets in relatively protected areas. Global society won’t survive it. Most of the places we grow food won’t be able to grow food, that’s already accelerating. Ocean acidification kills that food source. Blue ocean event accelerates runaway heating leading to massive hurricane force continental storms. Amoc shuts down and Europe ices over. Humanity may persist but civilization won’t.

      • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most of the places we grow food won’t be able to grow food

        that’s just not true! higher temperature makes food grow better, not worse.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Not if it includes lots and lots of drought. Besides of course that lots of the now commonly used crops definitely have an upper limit where heat is beneficial.

          • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Not if it includes lots and lots of drought

            yeah but typically, the hottest regions on earth (tropical rain forest, directly on the equator) are also the wettest regions on earth at the same time.

            that the sahara and arizona are dry, has nothing to do with the solar irradiation itself, but instead with the wind patterns.

      • Scrogu@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Vast current areas become arid but vast areas in Siberia and Canada become arable. Very bad but not extinction for humans. Likely extinction for many species though.

        • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          that’s also not true! vast current areas become arid tropical. see the tropical rainforest. it’s the hottest and simultaneously wettest regions on earth.

        • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          We are driving 200 species extinct a day and that figure is increasing every year. Eventually we run out of nature and we go with it.

          The temperature on the planet has never in its history changed so abruptly, which means plants and animals don’t have enough time to adapt.

        • edible_funk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          None of that thawed soil will be worth a damn for growing at any scale. Like yeah there will be areas that are more or less hospitable but large scale agriculture will not recover

    • snoons@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Really depends on what happens with phytoplankton; if they can adapt well enough to survive the excessive heat. Some of them can but others are dying out. If we lose all of them, then everything that breaths oxygen is extremely fucked since they make ~70-80% of that oxygen. Then we only have plants and forests like the amazon to make O2 (and we all know how that ones going), and then we would also have to deal with the gasses produced by all the oceans on the face of the earth dying and everything in them rotting… if they’re not par-boiled.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      We are adaptable creatures with command of technology. So we’ve got that going for us. We also have temperature limitations in which we can live, and so do our food sources. Then there’s the issue of potable water.

      It really depends on how far we’re pushed the planet’s ecosphere. It could do like before (most recent is the PETM) and hover high, then eventually equalize back into something not the same as we had, but similar. It’s done this before, albeit after millions of years. Or it could find a new equilibrium in another state, aka hothouse. Not Venus-like, as some media has spun it, but its own version of feedback to retain a lot more heat than now. Not great for anything that evolved in this climate.

      Fun fact: the PETM was the most recent heating event, 56 million years ago. Some species went extinct, others were able to adapt and survive as they evolved into smaller forms. The fun fact is that they adapted because the rate of heating change was over a large amount of time, many hundreds of thousands of years. Now look at us, a spike on the geological temperature graph in (looks at data) less than a 100 years (a few decades, really). So what kind of inertia does a more rapid acceleration usually give compared to a slower one? But hothouse Earth is just a speculation, just a guess. We don’t know how far this will go.