• ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is true but individual action is still necessary. Just because it’s important that we hold corporations and the wealthy accountable and curb industrialized pollution doesn’t mean that the average person isn’t needing to make significant changes. We can’t both maintain a consumer mindset and abdicate individual responsibility while also demanding sweeping societal changes.

    • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      We can consume the wealthy and abdicate them of the responsibility of carrying on and also demand change. Especially if we consume them while they’re still alive, as a mob, and do it with dull forks.

      The survivors will be far more willing to listen.

    • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      We can’t both maintain a consumer mindset and abdicate individual responsibility while also demanding sweeping societal changes.

      And you think it’s the “demanding sweeping societal changes” that has to go?

      Maybe we need to start with the individualism and “consumer mindset”?

      • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        And you think it’s the “demanding sweeping societal changes” that has to go?

        Not even slightly. I’m just trying to point out that neither of them “have to go;” shouting down someone advocating for either form of action helps no one.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And this stance betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the relative scale of damage each causes.