cm0002@infosec.pub to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 1 day agoWhile he got the core idea right, he shouldn’t have compared apples to Apple’s.infosec.pubimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1506arrow-down113
arrow-up1493arrow-down1imageWhile he got the core idea right, he shouldn’t have compared apples to Apple’s.infosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 1 day agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareblockheadjt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down4·1 day agoWhy did you put an apostrophe in a non-possessive plural noun?
minus-squareNekoKoneko@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoWhile this might be a typo, it could also refer to Apple’s idea, which is referenced earlier in the sentence.
minus-squareNigelFrobisher@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoIt’s social commentary on whether the technological product really belongs to the user or the OEM.
minus-squareXeno@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoI’m adopting this interpretation as my headcanon.
Why did you put an apostrophe in a non-possessive plural noun?
While this might be a typo, it could also refer to Apple’s idea, which is referenced earlier in the sentence.
It’s social commentary on whether the technological product really belongs to the user or the OEM.
I’m adopting this interpretation as my headcanon.