• Carl@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The real move would be to include polarized lenses or a holographic coating to block infrared facial ID cameras like Flock. Because most sunglasses don’t block the infrared spectrum, meaning something like a Flock camera can see right through them.

    These are basically just a dad joke, based on the fact that meta has made every other pair of sunglasses “anti-pervert sunglasses” by default.

  • twisted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So it’s not anti-pervert then. It’s just non-pervert.

    Anti-pervert would be something like sunglasses that zap the pervert sunglasses’ cameras with lasers and damage the sensor. Maybe they don’t have to be so accurate.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Maybe a sort of anti pervert mesh network where gamma radiation is fired in the direction of whoever wears pervert glasses and eventually kills them with cancer.

      It’s incredibly irresponsible and would have unintended consequences for otherwise innocent people but it would technically work so capitalism says ship it before China does!

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Meanwhile, I recently got new prescription glasses (after wearing my previous pairs for way too long, BTW) and got some that have an IR-blocking coating that’s supposed to block face recognition cameras. Because that apparently needs to be a thing these days.

    (I’m disappointed that these DuckDuckGo glasses don’t have a similar special coating. I like the company I got mine from, but I’d like to see more companies offering privacy-enhancing tech.)

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I didn’t want to give the appearance of shilling. But if you want to know, it’s https://www.zennioptical.com/id-guard

        There are apparently also similar products from “Reflectacles” and “Vaydr,” but they were more expensive and/or not normal prescription glasses. The Zenni thing is just an extra coating you can add on to the glasses you would have otherwise bought anyway (which is how I found out about it; I didn’t know it existed beforehand).

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Probably more expensive than AliBaba. Which might or might not mean better quality.

          • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Iʻve been buying Knockaround glasses for years. Theyʻre not owned by Essilor-Luxottica and have pretty great quality that has improved over the years. Only reason Iʻve had to buy new glasses from them was either due to theft or loss.

            EDIT to make the conglomerateʻs name accurate and not sound like itʻs co-owned by Aragorn using his kingly name

    • ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah… I think “anti pervert glasses” is a stretch for normal glasses. If anything, it makes you accidentally look like a pervert using pervert glasses to spy on people.

  • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Sooooo not anti-pervert and a generic publicity stunt. Haha please laugh etc. Don’t have anything against DDG but can only roll my eyes at something like this

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “No camera, no microphone, no AI, no battery, no electronics of any kind,” Knockaround boasts on its website. “Just a beautifully crafted pair of matte black sunglasses with a glossy DuckDuckGo logo, designed to block the sun and never send data to the cloud

    • DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They’re barely making back the research costs of producing sunglasses without a lithium-polymer battery or a 12 megapixel CMOS camera.

      THE ABOVE COMMENT IS SARCASM.
      
    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      there’s no extra markup involved here for what is essentially a marketing thing.

      they’re $35. which is also the price the ‘normal’ (not ‘collab’ edition) ones sell for direct on ka’s web site or at retailers like rei.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Sold out and I can’t seem to pre-order a pair for their next batch (maybe the next allotment is already sold out).

    Oh well, my wallet wins this round.

  • gl38@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Is DuckDuckGo going down the DBrand/Wendy’s model of irreverent, self aware marketing? I’m pretty tired of it being honest. Also, are they actually trying to make money from this? A satirical social media post would get the point across. But they’re actually selling these for some reason.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Some company just placed DDG logo on existing model of glasses and is selling them for exact same price as a joke. It’s not like DDG started manufacturing glasses specifically for this joke.

    • shishka_b0b@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The reason is probably to garner as much brand awareness as possible bc the goal of marketing isn’t to just get a point across. If a company like DDG can gain a good amount of brand awareness by advertising and selling some relatively inexpensive sunglasses with the company logo on it then I personally see it as a net positive.

    • mrmisses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, I love my ray-bans but I don’t think I’ll be buying another pair as long as they are making pervert glasses. I feel kinda gross wearing them, afraid people will think they are the pervert kind… kinda like wearing a red hat