• Doug@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    I read in a book somewhere that NOAA has the most accurate weather data, and that all other for-profit companies are just piggybacking off their data, but the companies fudge with the numbers a bit so people are less mad in some situations.

    For example if there’s a 10% chance of rain per NOAA, a company might report there’s a 40% chance of rain, so you’re less mad and more understanding “we’ll it was 40%” vs “wtf you call this 10% chance?”

    Just felt like telling that little anecdote.

    • Ghoelian@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      In the Netherlands we have the KNMI.

      Recently, they made their own weather app, for free and without ads, even open-source (repo). A few of the big commercial weather providers (that just regurgitates KNMI’s data) were mad that this app was better than their shitty ad-riddled version, so they sued them (and lost).

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        We had a similar thing happen in the US but the private corporations won, and for some reason now they get to charge you money to access free government weather data that the government only gives to corporations but not normal people.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      all this tells me that people to date still don’t understand percentages and probability.

    • Lennny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      They should just commit and say 50%. At the level of intellect, it either rains or it doesn’t.