ccunning@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 14 hours agoWould an LLM AI model trained wholly on consenting open source projects with a license requiring all derivative works be open source licensed still be problematic?message-squaremessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up150arrow-down1message-squareWould an LLM AI model trained wholly on consenting open source projects with a license requiring all derivative works be open source licensed still be problematic?ccunning@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 14 hours agomessage-square32fedilinkfile-text
There would a lot of problems with the feasibility and enforceability of such a project, but putting that aside…
minus-squareSnailMagnitude@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-27 hours agoIt’s been an academic discipline since the 1950’s and a work in progress since at least Ada Lovelace. Calling AI a scam for idiots is fair enough: but please include writing, machines and computers there too. World class moron Linus Torvadls on the matter 14 July 2026: "AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one. It may not have been that “clearly” even just a year ago, but it’s no longer in question today."***
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-24 hours agoWe have writing. We have machines. We have computers. We do not have AI.
minus-squareSnailMagnitude@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·4 hours agoWe don’t have AI? What year are you posting from?
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·4 hours agoWe have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.
minus-squareSnailMagnitude@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·4 hours agoThis sounds more like you have some kinda religious objection to a perfectly normal term in use for 100yrs or so. It’s not marketing, it’s the english language https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/artificial-intelligence With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 hours ago With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much. Fuck you too, shitbag.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoIt is not a thinking machine. But it is advertised as an agent, a personal companion, etc. Companies take turns releasing “rogue” AI to fool people into believing it can think for itself.
It’s been an academic discipline since the 1950’s and a work in progress since at least Ada Lovelace.
Calling AI a scam for idiots is fair enough: but please include writing, machines and computers there too.
World class moron Linus Torvadls on the matter 14 July 2026:
"AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one.
It may not have been that “clearly” even just a year ago, but it’s no longer in question today."***
We have writing. We have machines. We have computers.
We do not have AI.
We don’t have AI?
What year are you posting from?
We have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.
This sounds more like you have some kinda religious objection to a perfectly normal term in use for 100yrs or so.
It’s not marketing, it’s the english language https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/artificial-intelligence
With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much.
Fuck you too, shitbag.
It is not a thinking machine. But it is advertised as an agent, a personal companion, etc. Companies take turns releasing “rogue” AI to fool people into believing it can think for itself.