• otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The whole idea of someone not being sure if they want to use Linux while having an aversion to systemd, a system they likely don’t even have full context for, is just bizarre.

    You’re either new and don’t know what you want or you’re someone who already knows well enough if Linux is for you or not, and likely exactly which version you want to use.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Someone could just read into it regardless of what OS they’re on and decide from there if they want systemd or not.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Right, but if they’re technically advanced enough to care about system management at that level, they really can’t expect a comfortable and easy introduction. Hence the point of them already knowing what they want by that point.

    • BartyDeCanter@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exactly. The only thing a new user is really going to care about or even notice is if their hardware is well supported in first install and that the desktop environment feels like what they are used to. All of the fighting about things like systemd, snap, flatpak, deb vs rpm, etc are somewhere between a distraction and scary sounding words.

      • aloofPenguin@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        yeah, my first boot into KDE Plasma (technically Linux Mint/ Cinnamon) brought me the strange inner peace that i am now used to when I decided to try Windows vista on an old PC (at least the first few minutes, you really can’t do anything without a graphics card).