• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Like…we can’t just write off everyone else’s misery and suffering because you personally found a way to avoid it.

    The degree of privilege required to even entertain making a living as a YouTube starlet is astronomical.

    And, again, free video hosting and distribution! That’s why 99% of people put videos in YouTube. You can host something and pass it around without needing a self-hosted solution to manage it.

    That’s the business model. It’s not Netflix

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      In the beginning, YT was more like what you describe. It’s not anymore.

      Where you are wrong is that it is Netflix now.

      YT sees themselves as a competitor to Netflix. They have said this publicly. And Netflix is trying to compete with YT. They are actively managing it like Netflix without paying anyone for the “shows” that gets added to their streaming service.