• pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    he doesn’t believe that Native Americans should have any claim to lands within the US

    Isreal […] should have a one state rule over the region and people there despite other people living there already

    Unfortunately this is pretty consistent.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The Palestinian and Native American sovereignty rights, or lack-there-of is consistent. The claim to the lands stolen from them (the Isrealis) not so much.

      • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s just ‘might makes right’ combined with ‘our guy won’ and a helping of Western imperialism. You don’t need to be a philosopher to see the underlying reasoning.

        From what I’ve heard, you can see about the same thing in Ayn Rand’s lectures where she retroactively excused colonization of the Americas because “they didn’t do anything valuable with all the land”. You know, same Ayn Rand that wrote the bible of US corporatocracy. (Alas, I don’t think I have long enough time left to waste on Rand’s lectures myself.)