• AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Since a plane requires the most thrust at takeoff, you could use ground-based

    Actually dragging (or wheeling in) a wire or having a wire car supplying the plane with electricity during takeoff would work too.

    I think the only realistic use case is going to be short trips. For long range offsetting the carbon for jet fuel just makes more sense.

    But really small personal vehicles could be interesting. There is the Pivotal BlackFly which can VTOL and uses less electricity than a big electric car - and it needs to roads. So for commuting this could actually work to save on infrastructure.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Actually dragging (or wheeling in) a wire or having a wire car supplying the plane with electricity during takeoff would work too.

      After doing more of the math, I realized that the energetic cost of takeoff is quite a small fraction of the overall cost. So the only real benefit of the catapult would be to reduce the size and weight of the propulsive machinery on the plane. So externally providing just the electricity wouldn’t be much of a benefit.