• SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I think digitally verifiable ownership could be cool for, like, a digital TCG or something. But you’d need an actual use case for why this ‘ownership’ matters, which just isn’t true of the most noteworthy use of nfts.

    • KernelTale@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I’ve never understood TCGs. Why not just print out the cards. Why not to use a randomizer from which one should make up a deck for one duel. Is the fun gambling and consumerism?

        • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The store where I play allows for 10 proxies per deck. In the olden days they’d take a finger for every proxy but now they just take a finger nail.

      • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I mean, yes, gambling is part of the fun XD

        I don’t actually think gambling is the problem, capitalism is. A healthy amount of low-stakes risk taking is a perfectly good activity.