• FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This kind of post-truth nihilism is completely fruitless. If you dismiss evidence that contradicts your preconceived notions on the basis that evidence against other unrelated facts might also exist, then the only valid beliefs are the ones you already have. You’ve arrived at an epistemological position that rejects all new knowledge and positions all knowledge you already have as infallible.

      Why not evaluate the claims and their evidence, instead of starting from the position that any defense of Mao is comparable to defending the Nazi Holocaust? Not to mention, if you did come across a group of Holocaust deniers, is this really the weak response you’d give them? Not even going to produce any evidence in support of your own claims?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Getting people to read even short articles is impossible.

      Just be honest with yourself any say that you’re not looking to challenge your orientalist biases, that you just want things to confirm them.

      The communists were the ones who defeated fascism in ww2, Mao being one of the most important leaders in that fight against japanese fascism. To equate Mao with nazis or the axis powers, who they shed so much blood to defeat, is sickening.