SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world to Late Stage Capitalism@lemmy.world · 2 days agoThey don't work for uslemmy.worldimagemessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down132
arrow-up1989arrow-down1imageThey don't work for uslemmy.worldSaltyAmerican@lemmy.world to Late Stage Capitalism@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square127fedilink
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoYes, while admitting she was ahead anyway…
minus-squareSaledovil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoShe wouldn’t have been ahead without the superdelegates demoralizing the Bernie supporters.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoAnd of course you have proof of this, other than “trust me bro, the ref is to blame”?
minus-squareSaledovil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 hours agoI’ve shown that she had a significant unfair advantage. Proving that she’d have won if things were fair is on you.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoNot really, I’m not the one complaining, not into proving a negative. She won fair and square, if you don’t like prove it was manipulated and it altered the result. Burden of proof, and all that.
Yes, while admitting she was ahead anyway…
She wouldn’t have been ahead without the superdelegates demoralizing the Bernie supporters.
And of course you have proof of this, other than “trust me bro, the ref is to blame”?
I’ve shown that she had a significant unfair advantage. Proving that she’d have won if things were fair is on you.
Not really, I’m not the one complaining, not into proving a negative. She won fair and square, if you don’t like prove it was manipulated and it altered the result. Burden of proof, and all that.