Vindoua@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoThree scientists beat J&J's defamation suit over talc researchwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down13
arrow-up147arrow-down1external-linkThree scientists beat J&J's defamation suit over talc researchwww.reuters.comVindoua@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square2fedilink
minus-squaregnate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoAnother advantage is signalling (to the more gullible) that J&J has a leg to stand on. “They wouldn’t be fighting it if they did anything wrong.” Thin argument, but it doesn’t take much against unexamined opinions.
Another advantage is signalling (to the more gullible) that J&J has a leg to stand on. “They wouldn’t be fighting it if they did anything wrong.” Thin argument, but it doesn’t take much against unexamined opinions.