• antonim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Eh, both are proper spelling, I don’t think any Russian manual said it’s mandatory. The ë is used mainly in dictionaries, Russian schoolbooks, etc. where ambiguity should be minimal.

    • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s also used by people who respect the language and don’t want to see it gradually turn into a shitshow like English where it’s spelled ‘Manchester’, pronounced ‘Liverpool’.

      • antonim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        When was the last time you read a book which used ë regularly (as in, not just in cases as distinguishing все-всё)?

        • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          For better or worse, I’ve been reading almost exclusively in English for years, but also listening to English audiobooks wherein I learned a lot of new things about words that I’ve seen before. That’s precisely why I’ve become more entrenched in my belief that ‘ё’ shouldn’t be optional. And use it myself always.

          • antonim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            If you had read books in Russian, you’d notice that basically no Russian writer after Karamzin (who IIRC proposed the ë letter himself) “respected” the Russian language enough to use the letter. It’s legitimate for you to use it (all the better for me as a foreign speaker), but it’s not something to act elitist about.

            Whether Russian will go in the direction of English depends on how its pronunciation develops, for now it’s still pretty close to the spelling, although there are words and forms such as “моего, сегодня” that are pronounced as “моево, севодня”. I wonder how many people would support changing this spelling.

            • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              In no way am I elitist about it. I’m just opposed to the language moving away from being phonemic, and am rather alarmist about that prospect, even though I know full well that the pronunciation will drift away while the spelling stays conservative.

              ‘его’ is at least a typical consistent rule, mapping to the pronunciation ‘ево’ in the same places in various words, just like ‘eau’ in French. But the replacement of ‘ё’ with ‘е’ is just egregious violation of a letter that has its own sound, without any reason for that.

              • antonim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                In no way am I elitist about it

                I think that equating respect for language with usage of the letter and vague guilt-tripping of people who don’t use it is elitist.

                the replacement of ‘ё’ with ‘е’

                It’s the other way around, actually, ‘e’ is the original letter and sound, the sound changed by the 18th century or so (as far as I’m aware) and then the modified letter was proposed but never made generally mandatory. People aren’t replacing anything, they’re writing same as always.

                ‘его’ is at least a typical consistent rule, mapping to the pronunciation ‘ево’ in the same places in various words

                The name Егор doesn’t follow it, but моего and сегодня do. Why? You have to explain the etymology of сегодня at the very least to make sense of it, undermining the consistency.

                • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  47 minutes ago

                  equating respect for language with usage of the letter and vague guilt-tripping of people who don’t use it is elitist

                  Indeed, anyone using ‘q’ is better than others.

                  Oh wait, could you please check real quick if ‘ё’, a letter of the alphabet taught in school, maps unambiguously to a specific sound?

                  the modified letter was proposed but never made generally mandatory

                  Well maybe it was proposed because ‘ё’ denotes a very particular sound? Which, notably, Western languages can never quite approximate with their feeble ‘yo’ attempts, though Nordic languages do have a vaguely similar ‘ø’ or somesuch.

                  The name Егор doesn’t follow it, but моего and сегодня do. Why?

                  Well, perhaps because the letters are in a different position? Why is /ˈlɔɹəns/ of Arabia not pronounced akin to /ˈsɛsəl/ B. Demille?

                  • antonim@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    15 minutes ago

                    So yeah, you haven’t really responded to the statement that your position is elitist, or at least smartassery that no linguist actually supports.

                    maybe it was proposed because ‘ё’ denotes a very particular sound?

                    Indeed. And then it wasn’t made generally mandatory, and then the Russian language continued to work fine.

                    Which, notably, Western languages can never quite approximate

                    Why would that be remotely notable here? We’re talking about Russian spelling of Russian language.

                    perhaps because the letters are in a different position?

                    And what is that position that makes the difference?

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Fair enough. I tend to use it because it just reduces scanning ambiguity when reading text quickly.