For people who already tried both, what’s the reason you’re sticking with GNOME or KDE as your desktop environment?

  • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Before:

    • Gnome 2 was great
    • Gnome 3 was terrible
    • KDE 4 was terrible

    Today: KDE.

    Why not Gnome:

    • It’s missing basic features.
    • General new users startup is:
      • searching online to try and fix things
      • 50% chance of it working.
      • 50% chance of it not working because the fix doesn’t work on your version of gnome and having to find another fix
    • Common recommendation for missing features (to use extensions) is a non-starter since the extensions break after every update, so every update you need to go back through the general new users startup steps above.

    Why KDE:

    • It has all the basic features by default, and a bunch of extra stuff.
    • General new user process is:
      • looking through settings and changing the 2-3 they care about
      • looking through features, trying them out to see which ones you want to use, turning on/off the 2-3 you care about
      • Never needing to look through or remember the other settings, because your computer is already set up for you.

    Future:

    • Gnome: more of the same, likely basic features missing until specific people are removed (could be 5-10 years, then another few years of catching up).
    • KDE: Will continue making updates and consolidating similar features where it makes sense.
    • Cosmic: Will continue sanding off rough edges and fill in last remaining missing features. Will probably surpass Gnome for 90% of user’s needs in a year. Will probably be trading blows with KDE in 3 years and will surpass them if KDE ever makes any missteps.