• queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I wonder if it isn’t at least partially a psy op. This whole business of giving anyone who even looks at an LLM a scarlet letter, and refusing to participate in any critical evaluation of LLMs or other AI tools, plays right into the hands of those who would use LLMs to pollute, isolate, and destroy the free internet. The willfully ignorant will be the easiest to trap.

    If you can read this: beware the day that internet discussions of mass manipulation go quiet. That silence is the death knell of freedom.

    • Aqivex@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ayup. I’ve noticed and wondered the same thing. Very logical and great ROI, it spreads itself

      And the cost is what?

      A little Thiel anti-christ buffoonery here, a little Zuck has to make a blog post about the wonders of the happy AI there?

      Their biggest issue is just self correcting the sentiment gauge for their vanity, the machinery to ensure they are the only ones who use and control the tooling with proficiency is already in place from their perspective.