• anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Was this because they hated medicine or just couldn’t afford it?

    Not saying either is acceptable, but the latter is slightly more understandable.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      I mean shit, logically I knew that but seeing it written out like that is… it’s just fucking something.

  • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That poor child. What a long, painful death just because their parents couldn’t be bothered to not be pieces of shits. You can choose whatever you want for yourself, but when you have another life dependent on you then you have to do whatever is necessary to limit their suffering.

    When I was a child my mother told me that I had no rights as a human being except the ones she decided I should have until I was a legal adult and could move out of her house.

    I haven’t spoken to her in years.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It would lose an election for any politician saying it, but sometimes the child’s rights supersede a parents right to do whatever they want with their kids.

    You shouldn’t be able to do things like refuse to feed your child, refuse to give your child medical care, or refuse to educate your child.

    • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No. a presidential candidate should absolutely run on that. Child abuse charges for the parents for failure to seek medical help

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It gets a little trickier when you start talking about things like teaching evolution and sex ed, or not allowing minors to be indoctrinated by religions.

        • Poloniousmonk@autistics.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          @ChonkyOwlbear @KC_Royalz

          Want to really see the fur fly? Try banning genital mutilation. There is no defensible logic for chopping up a baby’s genitals even if your god told you to do so. That’s some barbaric, bronze age shit that should in no way be legal in any nation that wants to call itself “civilized”. It’s as logical as slicing a baby’s eyelids off at birth. Without anesthesia, I might add.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They’d lose if it were a local position within Idaho. Those same people who didn’t wear masks, refuse to vaccinate, refuses care for their child? All those same people are the same people VOTING.

        It would be different if it weren’t an election in the most brain dead state.

        Yeah, it’s impressive to find a new low BELOW Florida. At least Florida knows how to pull in tourists. Who the fuck wants to willingly go to Idaho???

        • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You don’t run on it you just enforce at a federal level. Republicans love state rights until they’re in power then they love telling states what they can and can’t do.

          Democrats need to force this down their fng throat

    • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      the child’s rights supersede a parents right to do whatever they want with to their kids.

      It’s pedantic but children have no agency, what is being done in Idaho is being done to children.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I would argue children have limited agency depending on their level of development. For example, child custody courts take the wishes of the child into consideration when determining custody of the child is old enough to express their preferences.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Smashing infants on rocks, with more steps. Someone should nab them for “post-birth abortions.” “Every life is sacred,” allegedly.

    • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      have to be grateful that child was spared living a life with moronic parents but at the same time feel bad that the kids life was cut short by moronic parents