• BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m trying to understand the logic. I guess they think the kids are too dumb to use Linux.

    So what if you’re running Linux on Windows? Does that qualify?

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The logic is none of these distros would do shit to comply with this, and enforcement is almost impossible. This is just saving face.

      • Matty_r@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        There were some people practically tripping over themselves to add all the prerequisites needed to support age verification. Instead of waiting to see how things played out, they just rushed through changes for things like systemd.

    • JTode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t know what the Cali gov was thinking

      But it makes sense to me, based on the commercial incentive. It’s not that FreeBSD doesn’t form the basis of products that will need to comply with the law (whatever Apple calls their desktop OS for instance), but FreeBSD itself is only for the leet.

      No, you don’t have to be a genius to use it, but you do need to be very weird, in that you want to use your own actual brain to solve problems, and you want to fully understand what the thing is doing, from bootup to shutdown. If that’s you, you’re a very odd person, according to many.