• adhocfungus@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Wasn’t the big complaint against Star Trek: Section 31 was that people didn’t want to watch Corrupt Space CIA? And don’t people enjoy SNW and Lower Decks because they embrace the lighter side of Trek?

    Honestly I think most Trek movies have tried to get dark and it never lands for me.

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Wasn’t the big complaint against Star Trek: Section 31 was that people didn’t want to watch Corrupt Space CIA?

      I think the much bigger complaints are that it was boring, derivative, and had nothing to say?

  • themoken@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    “Two movies we cite as comps for what we’re hoping to do are Training Day and Crimson Tide,” Goldstein tells Inverse.

    Hmm, I like both of those movies but way different vibes. Crimson Tide might as well already be a Trek script, but Training Day? Freshly minted Captain versus effective but corrupt badmiral perhaps? XO and captain maybe?

    My hopes this will be made are pretty low, but there could be some good Trek here. Especially if they actually made a movie that wasn’t a cameo fest (it does say all new characters).

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      I haven’t actually seen “Training Day,” but I suppose both films have entrenched authority figures with outdated and/or corrupt ideas of How Things Are Done, and younger subordinates who have to walk through the ethical minefield that’s been laid.

      And I agree, that could be good Trek.

  • billmason@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I will always reserve judgment until seeing it (taking the hypothetical stance that this actually gets made), but it’s not an exciting description of a Star Trek project (to me).

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I like Star Trek because it’s optimistic. I want to see competent, emotionally mature, people solving problems by working together.

    If I want to see bad apples I can look outside.

  • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is sad. The reason I’m going back and watching classic Trek is because I’m tired of every show needing to be dark and gritty!

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      "…while this [script] isn’t a cynical or nihilistic take on it, I think it does acknowledge that there are some bad apples in every institution that can have a strong voice and can really make an impact on that institution and everything it stands for.”

      How could they possibly think this is relevant subject matter in the year 2026?