• gon [he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The default wallpaper is meant to be pleasing, and I guess it’s meant to appeal to the average person? I’ve known several people that don’t change their wallpapers or that use that automatic carousel thing with a different image every time you wake the device.

    • eodur@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I usually set my wallpaper once right after install then never change it. I only see it for a few seconds right after boot anyways. If you see your wallpaper then you aren’t really doing anything.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I think that there’s a legit rejoinder of “Why aren’t you optimizing the code to reduce compilation time, if it’s such a problem?”

          For something like C++, ccache, distcc, PIMPL (to reduce use of templates, which blows up C++ compilation time), precompiled headers, make code more modular to reduce the size of the compilation unit that changes when any one change happens, break stuff into libraries, etc. Look to see whether there are things like build timestamps being inserted into headers that are producing unnecessary recompilations. clang and gcc can profile compilations to identify what’s chewing up time.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 hours ago

            that xkcd comic is coming up on 20 years old. most computers didn’t have multiple cores yet.

            • tal@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I mean, none of the optimizations I listed rely on multiple cores.

              It’s true that just running parallel compilation jobs on your build machine is a simple way to speed things up, no disagreement, but it’s not like optimizing compilation time isn’t a thing outside of that.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                i was thinking more about tooling, most of that stuff didn’t exist as widely as today and you couldn’t really look for it when waiting for a compile either.

                • tal@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  Well…the in-compiler time analysis I think wasn’t as good then, though I recall doing my own ad-hoc profiling, logging time for each unit. But the refactoring stuff should be available.

                  I dunno how far back distcc goes.

                  checks git repository

                  The git log goes back to 2008, so almost 20 years, but it’s also talking about release 3.0 then, so there might have been time outside a VCS or with history that didn’t get imported.

                  Wikipedia says that ccache goes back 24 years.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            In my experience, [proprietary] projects are doing well if their Makefile isn’t so broken that they have to run it twice just to make sure everything actually compiles. And you want them to actually optimize it…?!

      • gon [he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        IDK man, I like knowing that Frieren is looking out for me in the background. Even if I don’t see it, I appreciate that it’s there.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If you see your wallpaper then you aren’t really doing anything.

        I use sway these days. It’s tiling, so I rarely see my desktop background anymore.

        But not everyone uses a tiling system.

        While I like the idea of avoiding having onscreen pixels wasted showing useless information, and I think that tiling systems do help achieve this, I avoided tiling systems for some years, as a fair bit of software still didn’t play well with it (e.g. I remember default behavior with GIMP being half of the screen being the main window, half being the GIMP toolbar window). I think that we’re past that phase now, but there are people who prefer stacking window systems for various reasons and don’t use tiling systems.