“The Albanese government’s failure to act on packaging reform as promised is a repudiation of the public’s support of recycling and concerns about the health and environmental impacts of plastic pollution,” [the director of the Boomerang Alliance, Jeff Angel, said].

“The scale and breadth of outrage across a broad set of stakeholders from green groups to industry to state governments is something I have not seen before.”

A suite of potential rules would have set design standards for packaging, for example by prohibiting use of certain chemicals, restricting unnecessary or excessive layers of packaging, or limiting the amount of empty space permitted within packaging.

Other potential changes could have required producers to be responsible for the packaging across its full life cycle – from the design stage to how the packaging is used and then disposed of.

The government’s decision to shelve its plans was due to its concern that any costs arising from changes could be passed on to consumers when they bought products such as groceries.

  • arbilp3@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Not just 2026. This problem has been developing for decades.

    There’s been all manner of trials to deal with this problem, including coming up with bacteria that ‘eats up’ waste plastic. But nothing seems to be implemented, other than recycling and burning. I am surprised they haven’t come up with some chemical system to dissolve plastic into smaller quantities of materials that can be used in construction and other applications or that can be safely changed into less dangerous materials . Some recycled plastics are already being used in construction, etc, but that’s just not enough. .