• Feyd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is based on my experience, which I trust immeasurably more than rigged “studies” done by the big LLM companies with clear conflict of interest.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Okay, but like-

      You could just be lying.

      You could even be a chatbot, programmed to hype AI in comments sections.

      So I’m going to trust studies, not some anonymous commenter on the internet who says “trust me bro!”

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Huh? I’m definitely not hyping AI. If anything it would be the opposite. We’re also literally in the comment section for an a study about AI productivity which is the first remotely reputable study I’ve even seen. The rest have been rigged marketing stunts. As far as judging my opinion about the productivity of AI against junior developers against studies, why don’t you bring me one that isn’t “we made an artificial test then directly trained our LLM on the questions so it will look good for investors”? I’ll wait.