• nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Seems to me that this is a dual fail. The father should have monitored his kid more closely and not used his company card for this, but Google should have noticed the unusual spending pattern and flagged it somehow—I mean, it looks like something someone might do using a stolen card, in which case Google might never have gotten its money, if you need a self-interested reason why they should have been keeping a more careful eye on this.

    • OriginalTangle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      Two weeks ago, Google served me a sponsored link that led right to a malicious site trying to install malware. Not only did they not prevent this from being the top hit, they even profited off of it.

      The link looked a little dodgy in hindsight. To me. I feel like a company like Google should pick up on it. But they just don’t give af anymore.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You assume Google cares or held to account about your privacy and protection like any physical businesses have such as banks, shops or phone companies??

      Have you seen how little regard they give to the meet app spam situation? It is telling how little they have gotten away with care about their consumers.

    • chewypoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Why would a $120k spend on a business card (entered by the cardholder on an advertising account under their name) be suspicious?

      This doesn’t follow the pattern of a stolen card at all.

      EDIT: Dad set up the YT brand account using his employer’s Google Workspace. He handed all his work emails and sensitive auth to the kid too. Dad is stupid as fuck.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Dad is gonna lose his job and 100% blame it on his kid. Nobody that stupid would ever be capable of taking personal responsibility.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        $120K spent advertising a kid’s Minecraft channel is suspicious. The initial flag should just have been for “card not normally used suddenly spending a shit-ton of money—does this look legit?” After that, a ten-second check of what was being advertised would have shown that something was fishy.

        • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          A $120K marketing budget for a single beat of a campaign would match a company with credit cards with limits that large. Usually you don’t use a credit card for marketing spending though and your Google bill is paid by a bank account. It should have been flagged but they could be using their company cc’s recklessly making this a normal transaction.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Eh, not necessarily. Those kidslop channels can pull in serious income, a company starting one up makes sense.